Thomas Ferguson is the Research Director at the 八卦爆料. He is Professor Emeritus at the University of Massachusetts, Boston and Senior Fellow at Better Markets. He received his Ph.D. from Princeton University and taught formerly at MIT and the University of Texas, Austin. He is the author or coauthor of several books, including Golden Rule (University of Chicago Press, 1995) and Right Turn (Hill & Wang, 1986). His articles have appeared in many scholarly journals, including the Quarterly Journal of Economics, International Organization, International Studies Quarterly, and the Journal of Economic History. He is a member of the editorial board of the International Journal of Political Economy and a longtime Contributing Editor at The Nation.
Thomas Ferguson
By this expert
Central Banks, Green Finance, and the Climate Crisis
The tough policy choices ahead for confronting the climate crisis
No Bargain: Big Money and the Debt Ceiling Deal
What is the real reason Democratic party leaders go along with the debt ceiling ritual?
Postscript to INET鈥檚 Symposium on the Banking Crisis
Austerity for ordinary citizens and bank rescues for the affluent is a toxic mix
Featuring this expert
Linear Relationship Between Money and Election Outcomes Continued in 2020
INET’s Research Director Thomas Ferguson discusses the latest analysis he and his colleagues have conducted of campaign spending in the 2020 election cycle. The result dispels the myth that money has lost significance and that Republicans were at a significant disadvantage.
Noam Chomsky discusses INET research into money and politics on Jacobin
鈥淥ne place to look always is where’s the money? Who funds congress? Actually, there’s a very fine careful study of this by the leading scholar who deals with funding issues in politics, Thomas Ferguson. He and his colleagues did a study about a year ago a careful study in which they investigated a simple question, 鈥渨hat’s the correlation over the years many years between campaign funding and electability to congress?鈥� It’s almost a straight line, it’s the kind of close correlation that you barely get in the social sciences. The greater the funding, the higher the electability. You can find a few cases here and there that aren’t right on the line, but from the standpoint of social science it’s a remarkable correlation.鈥� — Noam Chomsky, Jacobin
INET research showing countries that prioritized health policies fared better economically is cross posted in Le Monde
Three American researchers, crossing the figures for growth and mortality due to the Covid-19 pandemic from many countries, conclude that containment is effective, provided it is accompanied by strong public subsidies.
INET research into the influence of election spending is featured in Truthout
鈥淧olitical scientist Thomas Ferguson, an authoritative scholar on money and electoral politics, has a valuable and established political science theory called 鈥渢he investment theory of politics.鈥� He demonstrates that the U.S. is essentially controlled by coalitions of investors who come together around some mutual interest. Thus, 鈥渢o participate in the political arena, you must have enough resources and private power to become part of such a coalition…. McGuire and Delahunt advance the thesis by showing it is actually worse than what others have found. Their study reveals and confirms that the top wealthiest 10 percent ultimately always win on policy — effectively showing that anyone else鈥檚 opinion outside of the top 10 percent rarely matters.鈥� — Rajko Kolundzic, Truthout