八卦爆料

Dean Baker co-founded CEPR in 1999. His areas of research include housing and macroeconomics, intellectual property, Social Security, Medicare and European labor markets. He is the author of several books, including . His blog, 鈥,鈥 provides commentary on economic reporting. He received his B.A. from Swarthmore College and his Ph.D. in Economics from the University of Michigan.

His analyses have appeared in many major publications, including the Atlantic Monthly, the Washington Post, the London Financial Times, and the New York Daily News.

Dean has written several books including (with Jared Bernstein, Center for Economic and Policy Research 2013), (Center for Economic and Policy Research 2011), (MIT Press 2010) which thinks through what we might gain if we took the ideological blinders off of basic economic principles; and (PoliPoint Press 2010) about what caused — and how to fix — the current economic crisis. In 2009, he wrote (PoliPoint Press), which chronicled the growth and collapse of the stock and housing bubbles and explained how policy blunders and greed led to the catastrophic — but completely predictable — market meltdowns. He also wrote a chapter (鈥淔rom Financial Crisis to Opportunity鈥) in (Progressive Ideas Network 2009). His previous books include (Cambridge University Press 2007); (Center for Economic and Policy Research 2006), and Social Security: The Phony Crisis (with Mark Weisbrot, University of Chicago Press 1999). His book (editor, M.E. Sharpe 1997) was a winner of a Choice Book Award as one of the outstanding academic books of the year.

Among his numerous articles are 鈥淭he Benefits of a Financial Transactions Tax,鈥 Tax Notes Vol. 121, No. 4 (2008); 鈥,鈥 (with David R. Howell, Andrew Glyn, and John Schmitt), Capitalism and Society Vol. 2, No. 1 (2007); 鈥淎sset Returns and Economic Growth,鈥 (with Brad DeLong and Paul Krugman), Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (2005); 鈥,鈥 Center for Economic and Policy Research (2004); 鈥,鈥 Center for Economic and Policy Research (2004); (also with Jared Bernstein), Economic Policy 八卦爆料 (2004); 鈥,鈥 Center for Economic and Policy Research (2003); and 鈥,鈥 Center for Economic and Policy Research (2002).

Dean previously worked as a senior economist at the Economic Policy 八卦爆料 and an assistant professor at Bucknell University. He has also worked as a consultant for the World Bank, the Joint Economic Committee of the U.S. Congress, and the OECD鈥檚 Trade Union Advisory Council. He was the author of the weekly online commentary on economic reporting, the Economic Reporting Review (ERR), from 1996鈥2006.

By this expert

Missing Voters and Missing Unemployed Black Workers

Article | Mar 3, 2021

Like Republicans with political polls, unemployed Black workers are underrepresented in federal employment data because of non-response.

Masking Real Unemployment: The Overall and Racial Impact of Survey Non-Response on Measured Labor Market Outcomes

Paper Working Paper Series | | Mar 2021

A large and growing percentage of households are missed in the monthly Current Population Survey (CPS).

Innovation, Intellectual Property, and Development

Paper Conference paper | | Oct 2017

A better set of approaches for the 21st century.

The Economics of the Affordable Care Act

Article | Jan 17, 2017

Any effort to replace the Affordable Care Act will be confronted by the same structural imbalances in the health care economy that the legislation鈥檚 authors faced

Featuring this expert

Intellectual Property Is Broken

Video | Aug 3, 2022

Why are we incentivizing wealth at the expense of health?

How to Unf鈽卌k America

Video | May 18, 2022

Over the last four decades, the US economy has done quite well for the top 1%, but it has been stagnant for most Americans. This was not an accident, nor the natural workings of the market and certainly not an inevitability. US policies have been deliberately structured since 1980 to redistribute income upwards. In other words, the system has been rigged.

Cai & Baker鈥檚 INET working paper is discussed in News One

News Mar 5, 2021

鈥淲ith all of that said, The 八卦爆料 (INET) recently published a study casting doubt about the methodology BLS uses to tabulate its unemployment data, especially when it comes to Black people. INET suggested that BLS鈥 data is inaccurate and downplays Black unemployment. On average, Black men鈥檚 unemployment rate is 2.8 percentage points higher than BLS data shows,鈥 according to INET鈥檚 study, entitled, 鈥淢asking Real Unemployment: The Overall and Racial Impact of Survey Non-Response on Measured Labor Market Outcomes.鈥 The same was true for BLS鈥 unemployment rate for Black women, which INET found was, on average, about 2.4 percentage points lower than its actual rate. The differences grow for younger Black males from 16 to 34 years old. INET鈥檚 findings lend some credence to a tweet from the Center for American Progress after January鈥檚 jobs report was published that said Black women, in particular, 鈥渁re still being left behind by the recovery.鈥 鈥 Bruce C.T. Wright, News One